26 November 2010

Remembering 26/11


(Republishing an earlier post)

Today is the anniversary of 26/11 Mumbai attacks, where ten terrorists from Pakistan ventured into the shores of Mumbai and wreaked havoc. 172 people lost their lives and 293 got injured. The panic it created in the minds of Indians was beyond these numbers; but we as a nation responded courageously, the security forces swung into action and killed 9 terrorists and captured one alive. The assault lasted for long 72 hours, where the whole country was dreadfully watching the television to know the events as they unfolded.

The terrorists went on a killing spree at Chatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST), Cama Hospital, Leopold Café, the Nariman house, the Oberoi-Trident Hotel and the Taj Mahal Hotel. People from the security forces and laymen died in the attack, but only after giving a good fight back. The bravery shown by ordinary people, including the staff of the Taj and Oberoi hotels is part of the folklore now. Brave men in uniform, with scant regard for their own lives, went on to take on the terrorists and defeated them. Some of these brave men lost their lives while doing their duty and we salute them for their courage and bravery. The courage shown by ordinary Mumbaikars is in itself a matter that deserves huge accolades.

When we Indians are observing the first anniversary of the Mumbai terror attacks, the Pakistani anti-terror court has indicted seven men - Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi (the operations commander of Lashkar-e-Taiba, LeT), Abdul Wajid alias Zarar Shah, Hamad Amin Sadiq, Mazhar Iqbal alias Abu al Qama, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Jamil Ahmed and Younus – for the attack. All these men have pleaded not guilty for the crime. The court proceedings are expected to go on for some months, if not years. In the meantime, the court proceedings against Ajmal Kasab, the lone terrorist captured live by India is also moving on in a slow manner.

Though there were a lot of knee-jerk reactions from people in India, including some political parties, the Indian government showed restraint and didn’t go on for a war with Pakistan. It was a sensible thing to do because had India gone out for a war with Pakistan we would have done exactly what the terrorists wanted from the attack on Mumbai - the destabilising of the region. At the same time the Indian government has been on the offensive ever since using the diplomatic channels by pressurising Pakistan to bring to justice those responsible for the attack on Mumbai. As of now, no credible actions have been taken by the Pakistani government as is expected because of the overt and covert support that the Pakistani ISI has been giving to the terrorists to launch attacks against India.

Since the Mumbai attack last year, there have been no more attacks of that scale till now. But is this a matter for complacency or is it just a lull before the next major strike that the terrorists are planning, we don’t know. But what we know is that we have to beef up the security apparatus in the country. A step in the right place was immediately taken by the government by removing the incompetent minister Shivraj Patil from the Home Ministry and posting the ever-competent P Chidambaram to the post. The no-nonsense attitude of PC has already started to show some results and he is working over time for making sure that the security services in the country are ready to face another eventuality. But he has warned the country that we are still vulnerable to terrorist attacks and therefore has to work ever so faster to close all gaps that are there in the security system of the country. Not only the central government, but also the state governments, public and private organisations as well as ordinary citizens need to be alert and should do everything possible within their realm to increase the security systems in the country.

People in Mumbai were killed by the terrorists irrespective of their religion, race, caste, creed, nationality, gender or the states from which they were coming. Indians from different parts of the country came out in support of the Mumbaikars during their time of grief. NSG commandos from north India came to Mumbai and rescued the city from the clutches of the terrorist and the Mumbaikars gave a great reception to the NSG commandoes after the operation was over. This sense of strong nationality should have opened the eyes of regional chauvinists like the Shiv Sena of Bal Thackeray and the Maharashtra Nava Nirman Sena (MNS) of Raj Thackeray, but unfortunately it hasn’t. Instead they still go ahead with their narrow regionalism and it is up to the people of Mumbai and Maharshtra to teach them a lesson by voting both these parties out of reckoning.

Mumbai is not only the major trade centre in India but also a place that is an avenue for all those who pursue their personal and professional dreams. Mumbai has always been a resilient city and the resilience of the Mumbaikars was made all the more evident by the opening of the Leopold Café only after two days of the Mumbai attacks. And what more, people thronged Leopold Café in such large number to show their support on the opening day that the café had to be closed earlier than normal time on that day as it was not able to meet the demand of the large number of customers. With such show of solidarity the Mumbaikars were telling the terrorist that they may be able to shock them but can’t beat them. On this day, I join in the grief of the bereaved, salute those brave men who lost their lives saving the city and country’s pride and show solidarity with the people of Mumbai.

25 November 2010

International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women 2010

Women all over the word face violence in different forms in their houses, in their workplaces, in their neighbourhoods and its needless to say that such violence against the gentler gender has no place in a civilised world.

The United Nations observes 25 November as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women to spread the word that violence against women and girls has no place in any society and impunity for perpetrators must no longer be tolerated. Violence against women is an obstacle to the universal achievement of equality, development and peace and is a violation of the fundamental human rights and freedom of women.

On this international day the United Nations urges governments, civil society, corporate sector and individuals to take responsibility to eradicate violence against women and girls.

Source: Official website of the United Nations

21 November 2010

Urgent Action - Child Held Without Charge or Trial in India

(Amnesty International Appeal)

Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh, a child aged 14, has been detained without charge or trial by the Jammu and Kashmir authorities in India since 21 April 2010. Following meetings with the state authorities, Amnesty International believes that a burst of public campaigning at this stage could lead to his release.

Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh was arrested on 9 April 2010. He is alleged to have been part of a large mob which pelted police and security forces with stones during ongoing protests against the state in Srinagar, the capital of the northern Jammu and Kashmir state. He was released on bail after eight days in custody but was again detained without charge or trial on 21 April.

Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh’s family was not informed that he was detained but came to know of it by chance when a local resident saw him in a police vehicle, being taken to a jail in another town.

Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh was initially held at Udhampur Jail and is now held at Kot Bhalwal Jail at Jammu. Both are regular prisons without any special facilities for detaining children. Prison conditions in Jammu are harsh and the provision of health care is limited.

The police claim that Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh is 19 years old. His family members told Amnesty International that Mushtaq was born in 1996 and is therefore only 14 years old. Prison records are reported to also confirm that Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh is indeed a child.

His case was raised by Amnesty International in meetings with the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir and the State Human Rights Commission. Despite their assurances that they would look into the case, Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh continues to remain in detention.

PLEASE WRITE IMMEDIATELY in English or your own language:

Demanding that the state authorities immediately end the detention without charge or trial of Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh;

Urging that if charged with a recognizable criminal offence, Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh be treated in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and held and tried in special facilities for children;

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 28 DECEMBER 2010 TO:

Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir
Omar Abdullah
Civil Secretariat
Government of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu – 180 001
Fax: +91 191 2546466
Salutation: Dear Chief Minister

And copies to:
Minister of Home Affairs
P Chidambaram
North Block, Central Secretariat
New Delhi – 110 001
Fax: + 91 11 23094221
Email: hm@nic.in

Also send copies to diplomatic representatives accredited to your country. Please check with your section office if sending appeals after the above date.

Additional Information

Mushtaq Ahmad Sheikh is detained under the J&K Public Safety Act – a law that allows the state authorities to detain persons for up to two years without any judicial review of the allegations against them. Repeat detentions are also commonly ordered.

At least 322 people are reported to have been detained without trial under the provisions of the Public Safety Act in J&K in 2010 alone. A number of them, reportedly including some more children, have been detained on similar grounds of stone pelting and rioting during various protests against the Indian government throughout the summer of 2010.


UA: 239/10 Index: ASA 20/032/2010 Issue Date: 16 November 2010

16 November 2010

Today, 16 November is International Day of Tolerance


We are living in a world where intolerance in its worst form manifested as violence against people of opposite gender, of different races and religion, of different colour, of different nationality and of different political views is becoming omnipresent. Therefore it has become imperative for the world to guard against such a big threat as intolerance. It is with this grand idea that UNESCO is observing 16 November as the International Day of Tolerance.

Tolerance for ideas and opinions different from that of ours is one of the basic foundations on which democracy rests. What we see all over the world, particularly in India, is that there is intolerance among political parties on people that differ from their own beliefs and opinions. For the successful functioning of democracy we need to imbibe the spirit of tolerance. Such tolerance to opposing ideas and opinions is necessary to inspire freedom of thought and expression, which is a prerequisite for economic and social development.

We Indians, on virtue of being born in the land of the Mahatma, have the moral responsibility to take the leadership in preaching and practising tolerance. Let this be the day we re-commit ourselves to this great universal value.

10 November 2010

World Science Day for Peace and Development

The importance of science lies in its utility as a vehicle for human development. History has shown that science can contribute to peace and development as well as result in destruction and chaos. It is up to the human beings to decide how to use it – for the betterment of human life or for the detriment of it. World Science Day for Peace and Development (WSDPD) is observed every year on 10 November by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) to spotlight the contribution made by science in achieving sustainable development and enhancing the prospects of peace.

WSDPD was established by UNESCO in the year 2001 as an occasion to remind its mandate and commitment on Science. The objectives of WSDPD are the following.
  • To strengthen public awareness on the role of science for peaceful and sustainable societies
  • To promote national and international solidarity for a shared science between countries
  • To renew national and international commitment for the use of science for the benefit of societies
  • To draw attention to the challenges faced by science and raise support for the scientific endeavour
Source: Official website of UNESCO

03 November 2010

Obama in India


There is a palpable sense of excitement all over the media and in the political circles in India and the reason is the imminent visit of American President Barack Obama that would commence on 6th November from Mumbai, where he is going to land in his Air Force One. Though both his predecessors, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton had visited India, Obama is the first US President who is visiting India in the first half of the first term as President.

Barack Hussein Obama is embarking on his first visit to India, the homeland of one of his idols, Mahatma Gandhi. Obama’s India visit has a four point agenda – partnering and investing in India’s rise as an economic and strategic powerhouse, restraining China’s domination in Asia and in the world, boosting US business in various fields including nuclear commerce and in associating with India in the affairs in Afghanistan and Africa.

A rising China is a threat for both India and the US as the near autocracy in Chinese government makes it a very dangerous country. Aggressive China has a very dubious record when it comes to its relationship with India. Both countries don’t trust each other and they always had border issues. The issues with the stapled visas that China gave to Indians from Kashmir and the Tibetan autonomy factor are major thorns in the relationship between the two countries (on the stapled visa issue it must be noted here that it is high time India reciprocate in the same way by giving stapled visa to the Tibetans and to the Uighur Chinese from the Xinjiang autonomous region of China). Therefore it is quite important for India to be wary of China’s growth in the region, especially when China is trying to indulge in the dubious development activities in many of India’s neighbour countries including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. China is one of Unites States’ most important creditors and this fact is a dangerous proposition as far as the US is concerned. Though officially India and the US are not accepting that they want to curb China’s growth, it is too obvious that both countries are suspicious of China’s aggressive economic and strategic intentions. Therefore the US would believe that it is strategically important for them to help India in its rise. The high importance that the US gives to its relationship with India can be clearly seen from the fact that Manmohan Singh was the first leader of a state invited by Barack Obama after becoming the President of the United States.

Boosting US business is another important agenda of this Obama visit. It can be safely assumed at this point of time that Obama will definitely sign a defence deal with India. The area of nuclear commerce is another business opportunity that Obama would be looking to grab. After the Indo-US nuclear deal it is time for both countries to move ahead in the field of nuclear commerce. The outsourcing industry in India would be closely monitoring Obama’s state visit in India as there have been some voices of aversion from him on the outsourcing question. It is quite clear that he is against US companies shipping jobs to India and thinks that it is a major reason why unemployment rate is rather high in the US. But it must be seen how much protectionism he would bring in his country’s international trade and how it would affect Indian industry, particularly the software sector.

With this visit, Barack Obama would also be looking at partnering with India in Afghanistan and in Africa. It is a known fact the US is badly caught up in Afghanistan’s political and security mire at this point of time. Obama would be looking forward to get India’s assurance in its greater involvement in Afghanistan’s development and in making that country more secure. Economic and social development of African countries is another matter where Obama would be looking to get more assistance from India. With its strong ties with many African countries, India can play a positive role in the development of various countries in the black continent. India through its association in IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa) is already involved in the assistance of African countries in their development.

It would be prudent for India to not expect much from Obama’s state visit. At the time of writing of this piece the counting of the votes in US election for the Senate and House of Representatives is going on. Results that have come up hitherto show that the Republicans would capture the House of Representatives, but would fall short of capturing the Senate. It would mean that there would be lot of domestic pressure on Obama to do more to save the country from the higher risks of unemployment and to better the economy that is reeling after the global economic slowdown. For the rest of his two years as President his time would be more absorbed by these domestic matters than the international affairs. However he would be keen to call back all US troops from Afghanistan before his first term ends in 2012.

Whatever may be the economic and strategic results of Obama’s state visit to India, one thing is sure that we are certain to hear a great speech from this inspiring, prolific orator when he addresses the joint session of the Parliament on 8th November. It must be seen whether the leftists in India would be present in this joint session of Parliament. Their inherent dislike for America and American Presidents are well known and they are sure to protest if India inks any defence deal with the United States during Obama’s visit. They have the history of protesting to all Indo-US alliances – may it be the nuclear deal or the combined military exercises (at the same time they made no protests when India did military exercise with Communist China).

Barack Obama’s Presidential visit to India in his first term shows India’s growing clout in international politics. India’s membership in the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member after 19 years is a major achievement that it could use for getting the support of all permanent members of the UN Security Council in its quest to become a permanent member with veto power. Indian strategic community would do well if it uses Obama’s visit to get his country’s support for the same.

02 November 2010

India: Chhattisgarh authorities must immediately release Prisoner of Conscience Kartam Joga

(Amnesty International Public Statement)

AI Index: ASA20/031/2010
1 November 2010

Amnesty International has been closely following the case of Kartam Joga, an adivasi (Indigenous) political activist who has been imprisoned in the central Indian state of Chhattisgarh. 40-year-old Kartam Joga has been in Dantewada district jail since 14 September 2010.

Amnesty International considers Kartam Joga to be a Prisoner of Conscience and that the charges brought against him are politically motivated and a pretext to detain him on account of his political activism which has never involved the use or advocacy of violence. The organization believes that the authorities in Chhattisgarh decided to imprison and charge him in response to the Supreme Court criticism.

The organization believes that the real reason for Kartam Joga’s imprisonment is his peaceful political activities as an activist of the Communist Party of India (CPI) and an elected member of a local self-government body and his defence of human rights of adivasi communities.

In 2007 he had participated in petitioning India’s Supreme Court regarding human rights violations in Chhattisgargh and impunity for security forces and Salwa Judum, widely held to be a state-supported militia who were involved in operations against the armed Maoists in the Bastar region of the state since 2005.

The charges against him include collaborating with the Maoists in ambushing and killing 76 Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel on 6 April 2010, murdering a leader of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Budhram Sodi in May 2010, killing the father of a special police officer attached to the CRPF in August 2010, and ambushing a truck and killing four persons on 7 December 2009.

Kartam Joga’s arrest and the bringing of these charges came after India’s Supreme Court, on 31 August 2010, criticized the Chhattisgarh government for being “wholly vague and indefinite” while replying to several questions raised by two petitions filed three years ago seeking an end to impunity and violations by the Salwa Judum and the security forces engaged in operations against the armed Maoists in Chhattisgarh since 2005. The first of the two petitions had been filed by Kartam Joga and two other CPI activists, and the second, by sociologist Nandini Sundar, historian Ramachandra Guha, and E.A.S. Sarma, a former civil servant.

The charges against him and his imprisonment are another glaring example of how the authorities in Chhattisgarh target those who have sought to consistently defend the human rights of the adivasi communities since 2005.

Two other human rights defenders in Chhattisgarh – medical doctor Dr Binayak Sen and cinematographer TG Ajay – spent two years since 2007 and three months in 2008 respectively in jail on charges of collaborating with the Maoists before they were released on bail. In May 2009, another human rights defender Himanshu Kumar, and some staff of his organization, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which continued to document the violations and abuses against the adivasi communities, had to flee the Bastar area after persistent harassment by the police and district authorities.

Kartam Joga underwent medical treatment and an operation for injuries he received when he was attacked by members of the Salwa Judum’s militia in 2005. Since then, he has been in the forefront of documenting and exposing human rights abuses against adivasis, including more than 500 unlawful killings and instances of sexual assault, rape and burning down of adivasi hamlets and houses and the displacement of more than 30,000 adivasis during the conflict in Chhattisgarh since 2005.

Acting on the petitions filed by Kartam Joga and others, the Supreme Court, in April 2008, directed India’s National Human Rights Commission to ascertain the veracity of the allegations; eight months later, an NHRC report confirmed some of the allegations and said there was a need for further investigation into the complaints of violence perpetrated by the Salwa Judum, the security forces and Maoists. Three months later, the Supreme Court asked the Chhattisgarh authorities to list the measures it had taken to disband the Salwa Judum militia, register and investigate complaints of violent acts during the conflict, and compensate and rehabilitate the victims.

The Supreme Court has now asked the Chhattisgarh government to file a comprehensive affidavit in response to the allegations made in the petitions. In On a specific point made by the petitioners that the Salwa Judum militiamen were acting as part of a new organization, Dandakaranya Shanti Sangharsh Samiti, the state authorities have claimed that the Salwa Judum “no longer exists” and that the investigations into its violence were hampered by difficult terrain, inaccessibility of villages, inclement weather and hostility from the Maoists. A further hearing in the case is due on 18 November.

ENDS/

Public Document

International Secretariat, Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW, UK www.amnesty.org

Related Posts with Thumbnails