As is often the case with anyone or anything popular, the aam aadmi phenomenon, if one could call it so, has its share of criticisers as well. It can be seen that many political party leaders and ordinary party workers of most political parties are hell bent on finding fault with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). They suffer microscopic scrutiny from their rivals online and offline. In the social media and in traditional media there are criticisms of all kinds against AAP ranging from how impractical their policies are to how impossible it will be for a political party to survive in Indian political scene without credible and well thought out policies on economic growth, caste equations, national security and counter insurgency.
However such criticisms appear rather naive as there has never been a political party in human history that entered a political scene with well thought out policies on all issues in that political system or in the state where the party is trying to establish themselves in. It is always so that when a new political party confronts an issue they will have an internal debate and will then create a policy on that particular issue, on which they will hold onto tightly from thereon. Karl Marx’s Das Capital didn’t had ideological explanation on globalisation for the leftists to bank upon and it was later when confronted with the issues of globalisation that the Marxist Communist parties the world over deliberated on it and created a concrete policy on it. Similarly, given time, AAP will also deliberate among themselves on the various issues when they confront them and will come out with a policy stance.
The political parties and their leaders will do well to explain what policies of AAP they find to be problematic. Are they against AAP’s policy of fighting corruption? Are they against stopping VIP culture in India? Are they against a strong Jan Lokpal? Are they against improving education standards in government schools? Are they against improving safety of women in the country? These are the main policies of AAP and if you are against these policies then you are certainly against the people of India. These are the things that Indians want and the overwhelming popularity that AAP has in India is certainly because they stand for what the Indians want.
It is very important for the people of this country to understand that those who say that the AAP phenomenon is a bubble that will burst sooner rather than later - political parties and some section of the media – are those who stand for interests of the big corporates in the country. They know that if AAP and its popularity are not demolished sooner, more people will join it and its brand of politics, which will be detrimental to the interests of the corporates.
In the economic front there is no considerable difference in the policies of Indian National Congress (INC) and BJP. The deregulation of petroleum prices by UPA government is certainly a move towards helping corporates in the oil exploration and refining sector. When Narendra Modi led BJP won in some states in the recent state elections, the Sensex soared and BJP supporters were gung-ho that it is a sign of how Modi’s rule could reinvigorate the markets and will lead to further economic growth. However it must essentially be seen as a sign of what Modi’s corporate policies will be if he comes into power. They know that Modi will give them a free reign and will give them enough authority to make profits, even if it means putting common man’s economic security at peril. Without doubt Modi’s government will continue with the deregulation policy of the present government vis-a-vis petroleum prices. If AAP comes to power they will bring back government regulation of petrol prices (or so they say), which would be unfavourable for the corporates and the parties that take their support. It is such type of people who are afraid of the AAP and are constantly in the look out for opportunities to decimate the good-will of the party. It is the same group of people - corporates, politicians and the media – who run around saying that great calamities have happened when Arvind Kejriwal moved in an Innova or when Prashant Bhushan spoke out his opinion about Indian Army’s involvement in Kashmir. Many times before politicians have made such remarks and many times before political parties have distanced themselves from such opinions by their leaders. No sky fell down then; no sky will fall down now.
It should also be noted that all the major political parties in India were united in passing a bill that will keep them away from the ambit of RTI act. By doing so they made sure that they keep all their financial records away from public scrutiny. An effort to bring in more transparency into the working of political parties and their financial sources was thus thwarted effectively. In comparison with other established political parties in India AAP voluntarily came out publically with all documents that show the sources of their income. That was an act that showed that AAP was ready to practice what they preach. But other political parties were not ready to take over that challenge, which apparently showed that they have something to hide from the public. When political parties accept donations from the public and when they claim that they work for the public, it is their responsibility to come clean on their sources of funding.
AAP claims to be the political party that will jettison the ‘business as usual’ mode of working of other political parties in India. That ordinary model of political one-upmanship was on public view when AAP accepted the support of INC and created a government in Delhi. When AAP was reluctant in taking the support of INC and BJP, they were criticised for being adamant and obstinate for not accepting the support; they were criticised for pushing the state into another election, which was going to cost the nation more money. But once they accepted the INC support, the same people who criticised AAP for not taking the support, started crying foul and questioned the intentions of AAP and berated them as ‘opportunistic’. The age old political mindset of Indian politicians, the wretched ‘damned if you do, damned if you don’t’, was the emotion of the BJP there, who was sulking at its inability to form a government in Delhi.
When INC’s dislike for AAP is a result of AAP’s claims that they will seriously pursue corruption cases against Congress leaders, BJP’s aversion stems from the knowledge that had it been not for the emergence of AAP, BJP would have reaped the seeds of anti-incumbency against Sheila Dixit in Delhi. Had AAP supported BJP to form government in Delhi, they would have been happy and would have kept on singing AAP’s praise till the next elections.
People in India are fed up with the unscrupulous political parties and politicians. As this writer had written in one of his earlier essays, politicians epitomise all the vices that human ingenuity could invent. What we need is a new brand of politics, where promises made in election manifestos are kept in their entire essence, if not verbatim. A new brand of politics that will comprehend people’s needs and will work towards attaining them. What we need now is an army of politicians who are honest, principled and hard working, who work not for themselves or their parties, but for the people they represent. AAP claims to be such a political movement and if it can remain so all its lifetime then it is the one that Indians were looking for to change their fortunes. Let us hope that AAP will remain a principled political party devoid of all the ills that beset traditional political parties in India.
Disclaimer: This writer is not associated with Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in any way.
Disclaimer: This writer is not associated with Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in any way.
No comments:
Post a Comment